The largest year-to-year variation in global weather results from the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). At one extreme we have La Niña, a time when the normal easterly trade winds in the tropics intensify, and at the other extreme we have El Niño, a time when the trade winds weaken or even reverse. These winds are important because their persistence effects change, albeit temporary in this case, in the large-scale circulation of the ocean and atmosphere.
The near-permanent nature of the easterly tropical trade winds are largely a consequence of the strong warming of the ocean at the equator and Earth's rapid rate of rotation. Intense solar heating of the Pacific ocean drives strong evaporative uplift and cooler air near the surface moves into replace the vertically displaced warm air. As it does so, the incoming air is 'steered' toward the west by the Coriolis force (to its right in the Northern Hemisphere, and toward its left in the Southern Hemisphere). This really isn't a force in the strictest sense, but a useful mathematical construct to understand motion in a rotational frame of reference. In reality, due to its rotation, the Earth beneath is moving at a different speed to the loosely gravitationally-bound air above it.
In a thin strip along the equator, the Coriolis force is negligible so, rather than being 'deflected' either left or right, the friction of trade winds on the surface layer of the Pacific Ocean drags water mass along with it. These winds therefore pile up warm tropical water against the land masses in the western Pacific (known as the Maritime Continent). Even with this simplified explanation, we can now see why the intensification (La Niña) and relaxation/reversal (El Niño) of the trade winds has such as remarkable effect. When the winds strengthen, so too does the build up of warm water in the in the subsurface ocean layers of the western Pacific (with some 'leakage' through the Indonesian Archipelago), and when the winds weaken, the pile of warm water smears out across the equatorial Pacific Ocean under the pull of gravity.
ENSO is measured by sea surface temperature anomalies in a large patch of the Pacific Ocean centered on the equator. Typical El Niño events form about the middle of a calendar year, peak near year's end, and have normally done their dash by April/May the following year. Hong et al (2014) looked at the observational record and classified any El Niño where average sea surface temperature in this patch of ocean (Nino3) exceeded two standard deviations (around 5% of the observations) as a Super El Niño. 3 events qualified as Super El Niño according to this definition; 1972, 1982 and 1997. Interestingly, the authors identified a feature common to Super El Niño but absent during run-of-the-mill El Niño; a high pressure system centered over Southern Australia that fed surface winds back to the equator.
Perhaps the most obvious distinction between Super Niño and El Niño is that there is exceptional uplift at the equator during Super Niño (black dots in top left panel). Some of this air travels westward and descends near the Maritime Continent, but some also travels southwest and falls back to Earth via the Australian high pressure system.
A useful mental picture here is to imagine looking down on to a bucket of dry sand being slowly poured. As grains of sand fall and hit the top of the sand pile, they slide down this cone. Viewed from above, they move from the centre to the outside. This is what happens in a high pressure system. Air pressure measured at sea level is higher than surrounding areas because air high above the Earth is converging, becoming denser, and falling back to Earth - parcels of air slide down this 'dome' of air. As seen from above, the air parcel moves from the centre of the high pressure system to the outside and, because the Earth is turning beneath and this is the Southern Hemisphere, the air is 'deflected' to its left by the Coriolis force. The result is a wind between the Australian high and South Pacific low which flows anti-clockwise around the edge of the high back toward the equator and then joins the anomalous westerly winds flowing along the equator, thus completing the circulation.
Because the winds flowing along northeastern Australia are directly involved in super El Niño development, Hong et al (2014) derive an index they call the Southern Hemisphere Booster (SHB) index based on the north-south (meridional) wind intensity in this key region. This index serves as a useful predictor for super El Niño development and leads the Niño3 index by around 3 months (see Figure 4).
As the observational record only goes back a handful of decades, and provides only 3 super Niño, the authors turned to climate model simulations to provide data. The NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab (GFDL) climate model they used is one of the better models to faithfully simulate the characteristics of ENSO observed in the real world. In the 500-year long pre-industrial climate model experiment, 12 super Niño and 109 regular El Niño were identified. Despite some discrepancies, such as northeast a shift in the location of the Australian high in the model simulations, the models also indicate that the Australian high/South Pacific low circulation is an essential component of Super Niño development.
Climate models are predicting an extreme or super El Niño later this year (see Figure 6), but it is by no means guaranteed. We saw this last year when a huge pulse of warm water heading west in the equatorial Pacific triggered talk about an extreme El Niño. It never eventuated, but the half-baked El Niño-like conditions which did still contributed to 2014 becoming the warmest year of global average surface temperature ever recorded.
Hong et al, however, give us a deeper insight into what boosts a standard El Niño into a super one, and they may also provide a window into the future because of the lead time of their Southern Hemisphere Booster (SHB) index. So what do the observations this year suggest? Sorry, no spoilers here, you'll have to wait for things to play out and to read the follow-up post.
Posted by Rob Painting on Tuesday, 30 June, 2015
The Skeptical Science website by Skeptical Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. |