Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Term:

Settings

Beginner Intermediate Advanced No Definitions Definition Life:

All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home

Arguments

Software

Resources Comments

The Consensus Project

Translations

About Support

	Climate's changed before
	It's the sun
	It's not bad
	There is no consensus
	It's cooling
	Models are unreliable
	Temp record is unreliable
	Animals and plants can adapt
	It hasn't warmed since 1998
	Antarctica is gaining ice
	View All Arguments...

Latest Posts

Archived Rebuttal

This is the archived Basic rebuttal to the climate myth "CO2 is not a pollutant". Click here to view the latest rebuttal.

What the science says...

A single substance can be both a pollutant and a non-pollutant. It all depends on context.

At a glance

If you look up the definition of pollution in a dictionary, you will soon realise it's rather subjective. There are many substances out there that are harmless at certain levels but harmful at others.

Carbon dioxide is well-mixed in our atmosphere. That's because when it is emitted, by any mechanism from a vehicle exhaust to a volcanic eruption, it stays in the air for many years. Unlike water, it does not condense and fall back out as rain. Turbulence does a splendid job of mixing it evenly into the air. But there are places on - and in - Earth where much higher concentrations of CO₂ may be encountered.

The trouble with CO₂ is that it cannot be seen and neither can it be smelt. In other words we cannot detect it from a safe distance.

In caves and mines, high concentrations of CO₂ are a well-known hazard. They can result from things like rotting timber, oxidising coal and particularly by poor ventilation, where that mixing into the air fails to occur. Because CO₂ is heavier than air, in poorly ventilated areas underground it may collect into pockets waiting for the unwary.

Miners or underground explorers breathing a higher than normal concentration of CO₂ will experience gradually increasing ill effects. It depends on the concentration of the gas. For example the UK Health and Safety Executive has defined safe CO₂ limits for the workplace. The limit for long-term exposure is 0.5% (5,000 ppm) but for shorter encounters it is 2%. Anything over that figure is regarded as a risk to human health. There have been many accidents and fatalities over the years caused by high concentrations of CO₂ in underground workings and to a lesser extent in caves. Coal-miners refer to CO₂ as black- or choke-damp in recognition of the hazard.

Possibly the worst CO₂-related disaster was that of 21 August 1986 at Lake Nyos, in northwestern Cameroon in western Central Africa. The lake, only some 2 x 1 km in size but more than 200 m deep, is one of a number of flooded volcanic vents in a sporadically-active volcanic belt. Carbon dioxide-bearing springs are common in this area and some are present in the lake-bed.

Lake Nyos is typically stratified, meaning that normally its waters occur in distinct layers with different chemistry that do not normally mix. In something of a loaded gun scenario, the bottom layer used to become saturated with CO₂ from those lake-bed springs. On 21st August 1986, something caused an overturning of the lake, meaning the deep CO₂-saturated water headed for the surface. Like taking the top off a shaken-up pop bottle, a vast cloud of CO₂ was instantly released and travelled out from the lake along the ground. At least 1,746 people and 3,500 livestock died instantly from asphyxiation.

Modern technology and international cooperation have since been successful in controlling the build-up of CO₂ in lakes like Nyos. But clearly, in specific circumstances, CO₂ is as deadly a pollutant as any other.

Please use this form to provide feedback about this new "At a glance" section. Read a more technical version below or dig deeper via the tabs above!

Further details

We commonly think of pollutants as contaminants that make the environment dirty or hazardous to Nature and humans. A vivid example is sulphur dioxide, a common by-product of industrial activity. High levels of sulphur dioxide cause breathing problems. Too much SO2 causes acid rain, because it is so highly water-soluble. Sulphur dioxide has a direct effect on health and the environment. Fortunately, it reeks and so can be detected by us quickly, at concentrations as low as 1 ppm.

Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, is a naturally occurring gas that existed in the atmosphere long before humans. Plants need it to survive. The CO₂ greenhouse effect keeps our climate from freezing over. These are all popular talking-points that any climate change denier will rattle out in its defence. How on Earth, they say, can CO₂ be considered a pollutant?

Well, CO₂ is very definitely a hazardous substance when it collects due to being denser than air or suddenly invades an environment in large quantities. Under either scenario it is capable of instant asphyxiation of any living thing with the bad luck of being in that place. The Lake Nyos disaster of 21st August 1986 (Tanyileke et al. 2019) is probably the most notorious example. A stratified lake - where the waters usually do not mix - underwent sudden overturn. The overturn brought pressurised CO₂-saturated deep water up to the surface in an explosive release. It sent a cloud of CO₂ - estimates vary but it could have been as much as a billion cubic metres - hurtling over the lake's rim. The gas cloud swept outwards at an estimated 72 kilometres per hour. In its path were several villages; the most distant to be affected, Mashi, was some 20 kilometres from the lake. At least 1,746 people and 3,500 livestock were asphyxiated.

If you explore mines or caves, or work in them, you will be well aware of the lethality of isolated high concentrations of CO₂. These typically occur in badly or non-ventilated areas. Here, sources of CO₂ such as an underground mineral-spring or rotting timbers, are not buffered by mixing-out of the gas in air. Instead, the gas can lurk in pockets and is a lethal hazard to the unwary. The experienced carry portable meters that constantly read the concentration of oxygen and other gases. Thus they can provide immediate warning that a pocket of 'bad air', as it's known, has been entered.

So under certain circumstances, CO₂ is very definitely noxious to say the least.

What about the effect of raising atmospheric CO₂ levels? Over the past 10,000 years, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has remained at relatively stable levels of around 280 ppm. However, human CO₂ emissions over the past few centuries have upset this balance. Since industrial times started, CO₂ levels have risen to over 420 ppm - a 50% increase (fig. 1).

The increase in CO₂ due to human emissions has direct effects on the environment. For example, as the oceans absorb increased CO₂ from the atmosphere, that leads to acidification. Acidification affects marine ecosystems. It can lead directly to mass-mortality of calcifying organisms. In other words it can effectively destroy oceanic food-chains. Whole fisheries may disappear as a consequence.

Figure 1: CO₂ levels (parts per million) over the past 10,000 years. Source: Berkeley Earth.

Last but by no means least is the impact from rising CO₂ in the form of warmer temperatures. Rising CO₂ levels cause an enhanced greenhouse effect. This leads to warmer temperatures which have many consequences. Some effects are beneficial such as improved agriculture at high latitudes and increased vegetation growth in some circumstances. However, the negatives far outweigh the positives. Coast-bound communities are threatened by rising sea levels. Melting glaciers threaten the water supplies of hundreds of millions. Species are becoming extinct at the fastest rate in history.

How we choose to define the word 'pollutant' is a play in semantics. To focus on a few positive effects of carbon dioxide is to ignore the broader picture of its full impacts. The net result from increasing CO₂ are severe negative impacts on our environment and the living conditions of future humanity.

Updated on 2010-11-14 by steve.oconnor.

The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)

Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us