Archived Rebuttal
This is the archived Basic rebuttal to the climate myth "It's cosmic rays". Click here to view the latest rebuttal.
What the science says...
Cosmic rays have declined over the past 50 years, so if they do influence global temperatures, they are having a cooling effect.
|
The galactic cosmic ray (GCR) warming hypothesis is based on the premise that GCRs can "seed" clouds, and clouds reflect sunilight. So if there are fewer GCRs reaching Earth (because a strong solar magnetic field is deflecting them away), the hypothesis says there will be fewer clouds, more sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, and thus more global warming.
So more solar activity means a stronger solar magnetic field, which means fewer GCRs reaching Earth, which hypothetically means fewer clouds and more warming.
The body of scientific research has determined that GCRs are actually not very effective at seeding clouds. However, the hypothesis is also disproven just by examining the data. Over the past five decades, the number of GCRs reaching Earth has increased, and in recent years reached record high numbers. This means that if the GCR-warming hypothesis is correct, this increase in GCRs should actually be causing global cooling over the past five decades, and particularly cold temperatures in recent years.
On the contrary, while GCRs are up, global temperatures are also way up, and temperatures in recent years reached record highs.
Annual GCR counts (blue - note that numbers decrease going up the left vertical axis, because lower GCRs should mean higher temperatures) from the University of Oulu vs. annual average global surface temperature (red, right vertical axis) from NOAA NCDC.
Updated on 2012-12-30 by dana1981. |