This article by Eric Nost, Associate Professor of Geography, University of Guelph and Alejandro Paz, Energy and Environment Librarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Information on the internet might seem like it’s there forever, but it’s only as permanent as people choose to make it.
That’s apparent as the second Trump administration “floods the zone” with efforts to dismantle science agencies and the data and websites they use to communicate with the public. The targets range from public health and demographics to climate science.
We are a research librarian and policy scholar who belong to a network called the Public Environmental Data Partners, a coalition of nonprofits, archivists and researchers who rely on federal data in our analysis, advocacy and litigation and are working to ensure that data remains available to the public.
In just the first three weeks of Trump’s term, we saw agencies remove access to at least a dozen climate and environmental justice analysis tools. The new administration also scrubbed the phrase “climate change” from government websites, as well as terms like “resilience.”
Here’s why and how Public Environmental Data Partners and others are making sure that the climate science the public depends on is available forever.
Why government websites and data matter
The internet and the availability of data are necessary for innovation, research and daily life.
Climate scientists analyze NASA satellite observations and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration weather records to understand changes underway in the Earth system, what’s causing them and how to protect the climates that economies were built on. Other researchers use these sources alongside Census Bureau data to understand who is most affected by climate change. And every day, people around the world log onto the Environmental Protection Agency’s website to learn how to protect themselves from hazards — and to find out what the government is or isn’t doing to help.
If the data and tools used to understand complex data are abruptly taken off the internet, the work of scientists, civil society organizations and government officials themselves can grind to a halt. The generation of scientific data and analysis by government scientists is also crucial. Many state governments run environmental protection and public health programs that depend on science and data collected by federal agencies.
Removing information from government websites also makes it harder for the public to effectively participate in key processes of democracy, including changes to regulations. When an agency proposes to repeal a rule, for example, it is required to solicit comments from the public, who often depend on government websites to find information relevant to the rule.
And when web resources are altered or taken offline, it breeds mistrust in both government and science. Government agencies have collected climate data, conducted complex analyses, provided funding and hosted data in a publicly accessible manner for years. People around the word understand climate change in large part because of U.S. federal data. Removing it deprives everyone of important information about their world.
Bye-bye data?
The first Trump administration removed discussions of climate change and climate policies widely across government websites. However, in our research with the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative over those first four years, we didn’t find evidence that datasets had been permanently deleted.
The second Trump administration seems different, with more rapid and pervasive removal of information.
In response, groups involved in Public Environmental Data Partners have been archiving climate datasets our community has prioritized, uploading copies to public repositories and cataloging where and how to find them if they go missing from government websites.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91e53/91e53d2e5e2a60a16423a8e7322f1456a3e44dc4" alt="Chart shows most agencies decreased their use of the phase during the first Trump administration."
As of Feb. 13, 2025, we hadn’t seen the destruction of climate science records. Many of these data collection programs, such as those at NOAA or EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, are required by Congress. However, the administration had limited or eliminated access to a lot of data.
Maintaining tools for understanding climate change
We’ve seen a targeted effort to systematically remove tools like dashboards that summarize and visualize the social dimensions of climate change. For instance, the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool mapped low-income and other marginalized communities that are expected to experience severe climate changes, such as crop losses and wildfires. The mapping tool was taken offline shortly after Trump’s first set of executive orders.
Most of the original data behind the mapping tool, like the wildfire risk predictions, is still available, but is now harder to find and access. But because the mapping tool was developed as an open-source project, we were able to recreate it.
Preserving websites for the future
In some cases, entire webpages are offline. For instance, the page for the 25-year-old Climate Change Center at the Department of Transportation doesn’t exist anymore. The link just sends visitors back to the department’s homepage.
Other pages have limited access. For instance, EPA hasn’t yet removed its climate change pages, but it has removed “climate change” from its navigation menu, making it harder to find those pages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38361/38361e7b9a60d5fd602f26da1b6d24ab4f0d6225" alt="A screenshot shows changes made to a website."
Fortunately, our partners at the End of Term Web Archive have captured snapshots of millions of government webpages and made them accessible through the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. The group has done this after each administration since 2008.
If you’re looking at a webpage and you think it should include a discussion of climate change, use the “changes” tool“ in the Wayback Machine to check if the language has been altered over time, or navigate to the site’s snapshots of the page before Trump’s inauguration.
What you can do
You can also find archived climate and environmental justice datasets and tools on the Public Environmental Data Partners website. Other groups are archiving datasets linked in the Data.gov data portal and making them findable in other locations.
Individual researchers are also uploading datasets in searchable repositories like OSF, run by the Center for Open Science.
If you are worried that certain data currently still available might disappear, consult this checklist from MIT Libraries. It provides steps for how you can help safeguard federal data.
Narrowing the knowledge sphere
What’s unclear is how far the administration will push its attempts to remove, block or hide climate data and science, and how successful it will be.
Already, a federal district court judge has ruled that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s removal of access to public health resources that doctors rely on was harmful and arbitrary. These were put back online thanks to that ruling.
We worry that more data and information removals will narrow public understanding of climate change, leaving people, communities and economies unprepared and at greater risk. While data archiving efforts can stem the tide of removals to some extent, there is no replacement for the government research infrastructures that produce and share climate data.
Lets get directly to the point. Americas current executive government is removing and hiding data and information for no defensible reason. Its no different in principle to ancient organisations who burned or banned books they didnt like. Historical example include books by Copernicus and Galileo. And its no different to the way fascist dictatorships control and limit information flows. This is not The Democrats censoring the worst types of hate speech. Its the new administration banning or hiding of of vast amounts of data, facts, theories, opinions, and other information. Its the total destruction of free speech.
Well stated nigelj.
I regularly read a magazine called AlbertaViews (link to magazine's website). The cover of the Jan/Feb 2025 issue is titled
Authoritarianism:
They say they're for freedom
but they want control
Authoritarian control involves control over any and all 'methods of learning'.
Increased awareness and improved understanding, learning, is undeniably biased against the interests of people who need 'controlling authoritarian leadership' to sustain their unjustified beliefs that excuse their desire to harmfully benefit to the detriment of Others (warriors fighting so everybody loses but Those Others lose more).
Agree, the "ugly American" is alive and well and one of the many is now president again!
All governments worldwide practise "narrowing public understanding" with their enabling corporate media cronies. Disinformation,distraction,divided and a dumbed down education system helps keep a populous from rallying.
If nearly 40% on average of eligible voters don't bother to show for the last 4 elections,I'm not holding my breath for a peoples united steet protest to force government to change to a much more social democracy and to actually govern for you.
A comment I read- "It sure feels like our Republic/Democracy has totally failed... ;-( We are spiraling down the drain with no decent candidates able to step up in a two Party System of big money and Corrupt Forces...
It was about people hurting and continuing to be hurt the last 4years. Your instinctive reaction is if you have a choice between more of the intolerable same and a roll of the dice- rationally you are going to choose a roll of the dice.
This entitled country living with capitalism on steroids has voted for chaos, many threats to our fragile social order exist however greed and forever growth instead of empathy and understanding is a irresistable lure for our sociapathic leaders.
With the looming and worsening climate change disasters becoming more apparant, perhaps my naive dream of people finally living in a very different way but within a planets boundary will come true. Of course my Trumpian nightmare of fascism spreading as tipping points/collapses force the worst from us is slowly realized.
"From little things,big things grow". My correction, happy to be wrong. This is how policy can be /must be changed, thankyou some Americans. www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=nyc+protests+today#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:18b1bc33,vid:gy5pUw2S_uY,st:0
prove we are smart,
Hopefully the Americans interested in learning to be less harmful and more helpful to Others will develop sustained controlling influence over American leadership actions. The results of future elections will be critical indicators of what is winning the developed conflict of interests.
Indeed, it is important to recognize that only a portion of a population are ‘opponents of learning to be less harmful and more helpful to Others’. And the amount of ‘influence on leadership actions’ by that group is what differentiates ‘helpful vs harmful’ leadership action.
An example is that not all Russians embrace the harmfully incorrect beliefs created by Team Putin. However,, because of harmful control over ways of learning in Russia, it is very hard to learn and share the Truth about what is really going on. The result is harmful misunderstandings about more than climate science (Russian leadership has aggressively opposed learning about climate science) having massive influence on Russian leadership actions. And Russian leadership actions include promoting harmful misunderstandings outside of Russia.
Arguably, people who choose to engage in the Trump Republican misleading belief efforts (being harmfully misleading about more than climate science), especially by engaging in the massively misleading TrumpSocial (he gave it the misleading name Truth Social), also want or need to harmfully misunderstand things.
In matters of evidence-based understanding, competing interests develop agreement of understanding through evidence-based reasoning. And it is important for that competition to be governed by ‘interest in being less harmful and more helpful to Others’. Without being governed that way the competition could become an irreconcilable conflict with some competitors focused on interests such as personal rewards rather than learning to be less harmful and more helpful. The result can be a long-lasting. and very harmful, conflict of interests resisting learning to be less harmful and more helpful to Others.
Trump and his administrators are the USA's Brexit moment x10. My viewing from over-seas of the USA, from its international policies to its internal chaos has progressively stunned me. I only hope my opinions are alarmist and exagerated. To elect someone with his character is a sad indictment on the country itself. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntO04esSVJE